A file enters your workflow
Receive documents from your portal, claims system, lending process, expense platform, email workflow, or document system through API, SFTP, OneDrive, or upload.
Document & PDF forensics
Detect manipulated files before they enter your workflow
essential-fd checks incoming PDFs and digital documents for technically verifiable signs of manipulation. It analyzes file structures, metadata, embedded elements, editing traces, and other forensic signals in the background—then returns OK or FLAG with an explanation.
File fraud detection without false alarms.
Look beyond appearance
A document can look completely normal while still containing traces of editing or manipulation. Traditional review focuses on what is visible. essential-fd also examines what is happening inside the file.
How it works
No additional customer steps, subjective fraud scores, or unnecessary review noise.
Receive documents from your portal, claims system, lending process, expense platform, email workflow, or document system through API, SFTP, OneDrive, or upload.
Depending on the file, analysis can cover PDF structure, metadata, images, content consistency, barcodes, and other file-level tests.
OK means no defined signal was identified. FLAG identifies a specific technical finding and explains what reviewers should examine.
Forensic coverage
Objects, content streams, fonts, references, annotations, metadata, and revision information can expose structural inconsistencies and traces of later modification.
Creation and modification details are checked against the expected origin. Metadata alone does not prove fraud, but a clear conflict can justify review.
Text boxes, overlays, replaced images, unusual fonts, or separate elements over original content are examined in the underlying file.
Image properties, encoding, metadata, dimensions, and recompression traces can reveal relevant signs of editing.
Names, dates, addresses, bank details, invoice values, or employer information can be compared across submitted files.
Signature state and document structure can be checked for inconsistencies that indicate a document changed after signing.
Explainable by design
Many fraud tools return a general risk score, creating uncertain cases that someone still needs to investigate. essential-fd focuses on technical findings that can be explained and traced back to the file.
This makes it suitable as a low-friction fraud detection layer across large volumes of incoming files.
A concrete result based on defined checks.
Customers upload through the existing process.
Add a forensic screening layer to your current system.
Flag files only when a relevant technical finding exists.
Applications
Detect signs that totals, bank details, supplier information, dates, or line items may have changed.
Invoice manipulation detection →Identify editing signals in payslips, salary statements, employment documents, and other proof of income.
Payslip fraud detection →Check invoices, receipts, estimates, certificates, images, and other claim files before manual review.
Analyze receipts and invoices for changed values, replaced information, or repeated manipulation patterns.
Screen company files, certificates, invoices, and bank information before approval or payment changes.
Check supporting files in lending, leasing, rental, insurance, and account-opening processes.
One forensic layer
A single process can include a PDF invoice, photographed receipt, scanned certificate, and exported bank document. Checks can include PDF and image forensics, metadata and structure analysis, QR and barcode analysis, digital signatures, data consistency, company and bank checks, date and value comparisons, and custom document rules.
Useful output
Receive structured JSON, a UI result, or a human-readable report for routing, investigation, audit, or reporting.
Start with a pilot
See how essential-fd can screen your incoming documents and return a clear, explainable result.
FAQ
It analyzes submitted files for signs that content may have been forged, changed, replaced, or otherwise manipulated, including visible inconsistencies and technical traces in file structure, metadata, images, and embedded elements.
In many cases, a PDF contains technical traces of modification. essential-fd checks its internal structure for defined indicators. Not every edited PDF is fraudulent, so findings are considered in the context of the document and workflow.
essential-fd can combine deterministic forensic checks, statistical methods, and machine learning where appropriate. The final flag remains explainable and connected to a specific finding.
No. essential-fd reduces the documents that require attention and gives reviewers more technical evidence. You decide how flagged files are handled.
PDFs, common image formats, scans, and other digital documents can be analyzed. Supported formats and checks are configured for the use case.
Through an API, SFTP, OneDrive, SharePoint, or a dedicated web application.